3 hours ago
1
The demolition of Grenfell Tower could mean that the injustice of the fatal fire is “put out of sight and out of mind” and forgotten, some survivors have said.
The deputy prime minister, Angela Rayner, told a meeting on Wednesday that the 24-storey block in which 72 people were killed in June 2017 would be dismantled to ground level. The decision has prompted anger and claims that the government has failed to listen to the views of the bereaved and survivors.
The Grenfell United group said it was “disgraceful and unforgivable” that the voices of the bereaved had been “ignored”. The group, which represents some bereaved and survivors, said it appeared from the meeting that no one supported Rayner’s decision.
An official update is expected on Friday but the government has previously said there will be no changes to the west London site before the eighth anniversary of the disaster.
Views have varied on what should happen to the tower, with some in the community feeling that the burnt-out structure should remain as permanent memorial or an indictment of institutional failures that led to the blaze. Others would prefer that the tower is taken down, with some citing the mental health impact of its continuing presence.
Maryam Adam, who was three months pregnant when she escaped the inferno that started in her neighbour’s fourth-floor flat, said she wanted the high-rise to remain to serve as a permanent reminder to those responsible.
The final report of the Grenfell Tower inquiry, published in September, concluded that the disaster was a result of “decades of failure” by central government to stop the spread of combustible cladding, combined with the “systematic dishonesty” of multimillion-dollar companies whose products spread the fire.
Police and prosecutors have previously said investigators would need until the end of 2025 to complete their inquiry, with final decisions on potential criminal charges by the end of 2026.
Adam told the Guardian: “I told them from day one, I don’t want that building to be destroyed but at the same time, also, I don’t want to keep it like how it looks like now. I want it to teach anyone who had a hand in that day for what happened to us and what we lost, all those people, do not forget … I want that building to stand. Why? Because I want to teach anyone responsible: ‘Don’t forget.’”
The government has previously said structural engineering advice was that “the building (or that part of it that was significantly damaged) should be carefully taken down”.
Emma O’Connor, who lived on the 20th floor and managed to escape the burning block, said there had been hope among some that while part of the tower might come down, some of it could be retained and “erected into a standing memorial”.
She told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme: “If it’s really unstable then it should be taken down from the top to the 10th floor, which they say is the most unstable, so it then can be erected into a standing memorial. To me, it just seems like if it’s out of sight, it’s definitely out of mind for the people that are actually responsible for the lack of respect to human beings.”
She said the group’s questions were not answered at the meeting. On the format of the meeting, she said: “It was ‘I’ve made this decision, I’ll take questions now.’ We had three questions at a time and then they would reply back to us, but they’re not answering questions, they’re not saying if the decision is reversible, to actually make sure that something can be erected at a height, like to have a standing memorial.”
A spokesperson for Grenfell Next Of Kin, a separate group representing some bereaved families, said that while the decision was “deeply sensitive”, families “understand the hard facts around safety”.
In a statement online, the group said: “The structural issues have informed our position as next of kin. This is an uncomfortable conversation with uncomfortable truths at its heart. If wishful thinking was an option, we would wish the fire had not killed our parents, our children, our siblings, our partners, our grandchildren and our grandparents, who we miss every single day. If wishful thinking were an option we would want the tower to stand as a permanent reminder for ever.”
Grenfell United said the meeting showed how upset bereaved and survivors were about not having their views heard or considered. “Ignoring the voices of bereaved on the future of our loved ones’ gravesite is disgraceful and unforgivable,” it said.
Separately, the Grenfell Tower Memorial Commission has been consulting on plans for a permanent memorial in the area of the tower.
A government spokesperson said: “The priority for the deputy prime minister is to meet with and write to the bereaved, survivors and the immediate community to let them know her decision on the future of the Grenfell Tower. This is a deeply personal matter for all those affected, and the deputy prime minister is committed to keeping their voice at the heart of this.”
